Monday, May 28, 2018

May 28, 2018 
The Fields of Ypres 


 Along the fields in Ypres, graves were dug to house the fallen men, who would never again ache for their brides embrace or return to school after the war was over. They were laying in a foreign land, while poppies grew above them; a symbol of a sweeter part of life amidst the horror of rat infested trenches and rotting feet. The men knew they would probably never leave those trenches on their own accord. The one hope they had was to be picked up and buried, and therefore, avoid the lice invested trenches without any care to who they were or what they had done for their country.

In and around the area of Ypres, from 1914 to 1917, over 100,000 men would perish. Ypres fell victim to some of the first trenches, weapons of mass destruction, shellshock, and chemical warfare.

Seeing the struggling men gasp for air as they lie dying from chlorine gas, left men like Patrick McCoy, a Scottish officer, reflecting, “Death had brought its blessed relief.” Escaping to the trenches, presumably to avoid the chlorine air above, only hastened one’s death, as the chlorine gas actually gravitates toward the ground. The survivors soon were engaged in a light show of artillery fighting that would be dubbed, The Northern Lights. In the sickening onslaught of death, the eerie lights culminated from the bombardment of mortars, bolt action rifles, machine guns, artillery, and canons.

Some were left with a new symptom of modern warfare, called shellshock, or most commonly known today as, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Involuntarily, men who would normally bear the brunt of life courageously, were found in corners, eyes wide, reliving the nightmare of the trenches forevermore. These men found little relief from sympathetic onlookers. Good men, yearning to be rid of this hell hole, only found themselves, after returning home, unable to leave the images and experiences behind. It had all crept into a place deep within their being they could never escape. Hell in the trenches would become their hell, as long as time was their companion. There was no escape, no relief.

The only thing we can do now is remember. We cannot not remember, for if we do, we leave all these men behind in open trenches. It isn’t just that they deserve to be remembered for their sacrifice, but because we are living and have a responsibility to to not repeat these atrocities. If war is a natural state of the world, more so than peace, then shouldn’t we embrace the past for it is; lessons to be learned. To consciously avoid eliminating other human beings may be a good thing, one would think.

How many of us are aware today that chlorine gas was used in World War l or that the poppies we see on Memorial Day are a reminder of McCrae’s poem, In Flanders Fields?  From May 25-27, 2018, for the first time, America has embedded the National Mall in Washington D.C. with poppies, in honor of the 645,000 American soldiers, who died while serving in the military during World War l and the wars since then.



John McCrae, a Canadian doctor wrote, In Flanders Fields on May 3, 1915, sitting on the back of an ambulance near the battlefront in Ypres. During the second battle of Ypres he lost a friend and witnessed the German chlorine gas massacre. McRae would dub this second battle at Ypres, “17 Days of Hades”, which began on April 22, 1915.

In Flanders Fields

In Flanders fields the poppies blow
Between the crosses, row on row,
That mark our place: and in the sky
The larks still bravely singing fly
Scarce heard amid the guns below.
We are the dead: Short days ago,
We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,
Loved and were loved: and now we lie
In Flanders fields!

Take up our quarrel with the foe
To you, from failing hands, we throw
The torch: be yours to hold it high
If ye break faith with us who die,
We shall not sleep, though poppies grow
In Flanders fields.









Thursday, May 17, 2018



May 17, 2018

Media's Emotional Pull

Ah, the media. Their modern tactic is to have the reader or viewer engage emotionally. The more shocking, the better. But what if it is a lie being promoted and that lie may be about a person. The attention others pay to the report will be larger if the lie is bigger…leaving us ready to take up our pitchforks and stampede the person’s place of residence. Picture that.  It becomes a story with a plot and numerous climaxes, as long as someone keeps the story alive and feeds the beast with new lies every now and then. And that is what makes news NEWS.

With 1,800 media outlets scrambling to post a plethora of “news” stories each and everyday, we get a sense of what it means to be put under the gun. If you are an editor, reporter, online outlet, or owner of one of those outlets, you must report something! 

Why do we mere mortals think we can trust the media pimps to tell us the truth about anything? The very idea that we do have some trust in the media should scare us. Do we want to be duped? 

I heard a reporter once say that he was first and foremost an entertainer. He wasn’t a reporter first, but an entertainer and wanted the public to understand that he was paid to entertain, not report the truth no matter what, so help him God.  

The truth is, we want to believe something and want desperately to connect with something…anything. We want community and a sense of acceptance. If we can get on board with a story and feel for that victim or hate the supposed bad guy, then we have connection. We have something real. Or so we think.

But what if someone’s reputation is ruined because someone had nothing really to report one day and then heard a guy said something that was construed to mean something awful, so it was reported as facts. The guy now has to explain what the comment really meant because it was totally taken out of context and spit out as something resembling a horrifying truth. 

Are we willing to stop and look at each story with the eyes of a critique, who understands that maybe 10% of the story may be true but 90% is embellished? Ratings are the name of the game and if 10% truths sell, then the rationalization of all those involved will become immune to the other 90%. And eventually, the public becomes immune because of the craving for the fantastical and the human need for connection...any kind of connection.